Comparison of Xlerator and Dyson Hand Dryers


Hand dryers are an essential piece of equipment for any modern restroom. They offer customers an efficient and eco-friendly alternative to paper towels.

Xlerator and Dyson are two popular brands of commercial hand dryers that have emerged on the scene as market leaders.

In this review, we compare the cost, performance, noise level, durability, bacteria control, and environmental impact of these two hand dryers. You can also make specific comparisons of each model of Xlerator and Dyson hand dryers here.

Background of Each Hand Dryer


Xlerator hand dryers are manufactured by Excel Dryer and have established themselves as a significant player in the hand dryer industry – particularly in the United States. They’re known for their robust construction and high efficiency and their dryers are synonymous with durability and speed.


Dyson is widely recognized for its innovative and technologically advanced products, which extend its expertise to the hand dryer market with the Dyson Airblade.

Dyson displays an unbridled commitment to combining style with functionality, featuring a sleek, ultra-slim design and available in either white, grey, or Nickel finish.

Installation and Setup

When installing new hand dryers in a commercial setting, ease of installation and setup are critical factors to consider. Xlerator hand dryers are designed for easy installation, with universal mounting plates that can accommodate various restroom layouts.

They are also compatible with multiple voltage requirements, making them suitable for different locations worldwide. On the other hand, Dyson Airblade hand dryers are known for their sleek design and compact size, which can be particularly advantageous in restrooms with limited space.

However, their unique shape and electrical requirements might necessitate professional installation, potentially increasing initial setup costs.

User Experience and Accessibility

User experience is paramount when selecting a hand dryer. The Xlerator’s traditional push-button operation and high-velocity air stream allow for a familiar user experience. However, the intensity of the air blast may not be comfortable for all users, especially children or those with sensitive hands.

Conversely, the Dyson Airblade offers a more modern experience, with touch-free operation and unique airblade technology that guides the user’s hands to the optimal drying position. This feature is not only hygienic but also enhances accessibility, making it a superior choice for facilities aiming to provide a user-friendly environment.

Design and Aesthetics


The physical appearance of hand dryers can significantly influence the overall aesthetic of a restroom. The Xlerator hand dryer has a rugged and industrial look, which might be more suitable for settings such as factories or sports stadiums. It comes in various finishes, allowing for a degree of customization.

In contrast, the Dyson Airblade stands out for its innovative and modern design, which can complement high-end or contemporary restrooms. Its slim profile and sleek finishes can add a touch of sophistication, aligning with a company’s branding or design ethos.

Safety Features

Safety is a critical aspect, especially in environments with high traffic or children. Xlerator hand dryers incorporate thermal overload protectors and tamper-resistant screws, which ensure the unit’s safety and durability.

However, their high noise levels could pose a risk to hearing over prolonged exposure. Meanwhile, Dyson Airblade dryers are equipped with multiple safety features, including low noise operation, touch-free sensors, and sealed HEPA filters, reducing the risk of bacterial dissemination and ensuring a safer drying experience.

Brand Reputation and Customer Support

Brand reputation and the level of customer support offered can significantly impact long-term satisfaction with a hand dryer. Xlerator enjoys a solid reputation in the industry and is known for its durable products and effective customer service, including responsive technical support and comprehensive warranties.

Dyson, while newer to the hand dryer market, carries a prestigious brand reputation known for innovation and quality. They provide extensive customer support, including installation guidance, operational troubleshooting, and warranty claims, ensuring that clients receive the assistance they need.

Cost Comparison

  • Xlerator ─ Pricing can vary, but Xlerator is known for its affordability compared to Dyson.
  • Dyson Airblade ─ Priced from $600US/$900CAD, it is considered one of the most expensive hands dryers on the market.

Efficiency and Performance Comparison

  • Xlerator ─ The Xlerator is designed for heavy usage in locations like stadiums and schools. It’s popular for its quick drying time and reliability.
  • Dyson Airblade ─ Has a rated power of just 1k, consuming only 3.33 watt/hours per dry. It offers 1500 dries with approximately CAD 1.00US/$2.00 spent on electricity, making it 97% more efficient than paper towels.

Noise Level Comparison

  • Xlerator ─ Noise level can reach up to 97-100 decibels.
  • Dyson Airblade ─ is considerably quieter, at around 79-80 Db(A), which is below harmful levels.

Maintenance and Durability Comparison

  • Xlerator ─ Offers a 5-year warranty on parts and is known for its minimal need for warranty repairs, indicating high durability and low maintenance.
  • Dyson Airblade ─ Comes with a 5-year warranty, backed by a durable digital brushless motor tested for 240,000 uses, suggesting a long-lasting product.

Bacteria Control Comparison


Environmental Impact Comparison

  • Xlerator ─ Provides significant environmental benefits compared to conventional dryers and paper towels, achieving significant electricity consumption reduction and outweighing impacts even with 100% recycled paper towels.
  • Dyson Airblade ─ Estimated to produce a low 21.36kg/CO2 and becomes more carbon-efficient than paper towels after approximately 1300 uses.

Overall Sustainability

Both Xlerator and Dyson hand dryers contribute to environmental sustainability by reducing waste associated with paper towels.

However, their approaches differ. Xlerator focuses on high-speed drying and energy efficiency, significantly cutting down on the resources used per dry.

Meanwhile, Dyson emphasizes its low energy consumption and advanced HEPA filtration system, contributing to better air quality and lower carbon emissions. Facilities aiming for green certification may find Dyson’s features align more closely with sustainability goals, though Xlerator’s energy savings are also commendable.

Who to Choose?

The verdict is in. If you want the highest efficiency and longevity, the Dyson is your best buy. If you want affordability with comparable features and specs, the Xlerator won’t steer you wrong.

Xlerator is a robust and popular choice, appreciated for its durability and performance while Dyson shines in terms of energy efficiency, lower noise levels, and better hygiene control.